Anthropic Claude Sonnet 5 VS OpenAI GPT-5.6 Terra
Decision Recommendation
⚖️ Editorial Verdict: In our analysis, GPT-5.6 Terra is the premium intelligence choice, scoring 0.2% higher on coding benchmarks. However, this accuracy premium comes with a cost overhead: Claude Sonnet 5 is 1.4x cheaper to run. If you are building high-volume, simple chatbots or processing massive amounts of text where budget is critical, Claude Sonnet 5 offers excellent cost savings. For agentic reasoning, code refactoring, or complex logical tasks, the accuracy premium of GPT-5.6 Terra fully justifies the cost.
Was this recommendation helpful?
Model Specs
Claude Sonnet 5
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
63.2%excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
N/Agraduate-level science QA
Cost & Performance
Cost (per 1M tokens)1.4x cheaper
$4.00Input: $2.00 | Output: $10.00Context Window
1.05M tokensModel Specs
GPT-5.6 Terra
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)Winner (+0.2%)
63.4%excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
92.9%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Performance
Cost (per 1M tokens)
$5.63Input: $2.50 | Output: $15.00Context WindowLarger
1.05M tokensFrequently Asked Questions about Claude Sonnet 5 vs GPT-5.6 Terra comparison
Claude Sonnet 5 is cheaper than GPT-5.6 Terra. Claude Sonnet 5 has a blended cost of $4.00/1M tokens, which is about 1.4x cheaper than GPT-5.6 Terra at $5.63/1M tokens.
GPT-5.6 Terra is better for coding tasks on this benchmark. It scores 63.4% on swe-bench-pro (excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases) compared to Claude Sonnet 5 which scores 63.2%.
Related Matchups
Explore similar comparisons for Claude Sonnet 5 and GPT-5.6 Terra.