Anthropic Claude Sonnet 5 VS OpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna
Decision Recommendation
⚖️ Editorial Verdict: In our analysis, GPT-5.6 Luna is the premium intelligence choice, scoring 0.5% higher on coding benchmarks. It also maintains strong cost efficiency. If you are building high-volume, simple chatbots or processing massive amounts of text where budget is critical, Claude Sonnet 5 offers excellent cost savings. For agentic reasoning, code refactoring, or complex logical tasks, the accuracy premium of GPT-5.6 Luna fully justifies the cost.
Was this recommendation helpful?
Model Specs
Claude Sonnet 5
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)Winner (+0.5%)
63.2%excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
N/Agraduate-level science QA
Cost & Performance
Cost (per 1M tokens)
$4.00Input: $2.00 | Output: $10.00Context Window
1.05M tokensModel Specs
GPT-5.6 Luna
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
62.7%excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
92.3%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Performance
Cost (per 1M tokens)1.8x cheaper
$2.25Input: $1.00 | Output: $6.00Context WindowLarger
1.05M tokensFrequently Asked Questions about Claude Sonnet 5 vs GPT-5.6 Luna comparison
GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper than Claude Sonnet 5. GPT-5.6 Luna has a blended cost of $2.25/1M tokens, which is about 1.8x cheaper than Claude Sonnet 5 at $4.00/1M tokens.
Claude Sonnet 5 is better for coding tasks on this benchmark. It scores 63.2% on swe-bench-pro (excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases) compared to GPT-5.6 Luna which scores 62.7%.
Related Matchups
Explore similar comparisons for Claude Sonnet 5 and GPT-5.6 Luna.