whichllmmodel
Back to Dashboard

Anthropic Claude Sonnet 5 VS OpenAI GPT-5.5 Pro

✍️ Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|📅 Updated: June 2026

Decision Recommendation

⚖️ Editorial Verdict: In our analysis, GPT-5.5 Pro is the premium intelligence choice, scoring 63.2% higher on coding benchmarks. However, this accuracy premium comes with a cost overhead: Claude Sonnet 5 is 16.9x cheaper to run. If you are building high-volume, simple chatbots or processing massive amounts of text where budget is critical, Claude Sonnet 5 offers excellent cost savings. For agentic reasoning, code refactoring, or complex logical tasks, the accuracy premium of GPT-5.5 Pro fully justifies the cost.
Was this recommendation helpful?
Model Specs

Claude Sonnet 5

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)
63.2%

excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases

Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
N/A

graduate-level science QA

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)16.9x cheaper
$4.00Input: $2.00 | Output: $10.00
Context Window
1.05M tokens
Model Specs

GPT-5.5 Pro

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/A

excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases

Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
96.2%

graduate-level science QA

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)
$67.50Input: $30.00 | Output: $180.00
Context WindowLarger
1.05M tokens

Frequently Asked Questions about Claude Sonnet 5 vs GPT-5.5 Pro comparison

Claude Sonnet 5 is cheaper than GPT-5.5 Pro. Claude Sonnet 5 has a blended cost of $4.00/1M tokens, which is about 16.9x cheaper than GPT-5.5 Pro at $67.50/1M tokens.

Claude Sonnet 5 is better for coding tasks on this benchmark. It scores 63.2% on swe-bench-pro (excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases) compared to GPT-5.5 Pro which scores N/A.