whichllmmodel
Back to Dashboard
Z.ai (Zhipu AI)

GLM-4.5

VS
Z.ai (Zhipu AI)

GLM-4.6

✍️ Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|📅 Updated: June 2026

Decision Recommendation

👑 Editorial Verdict: GLM-4.6 strictly dominates GLM-4.5 across all major dimensions. It is not only more cost-effective (blended cost of $0.00 vs $1.00 per 1M tokens) but also delivers superior coding accuracy (9.67% vs 0% on SWE-bench) and faster generation speeds (0 tps vs 0 tps). Unless you have platform lock-in, GLM-4.6 is the clear and optimal choice for all development workloads.

Model Specs

GLM-4.5

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/A
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
79.9%

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)
$1.00Input: $0.60 | Output: $2.20
Speed
N/A
Context Window
131.07k tokens
Model Specs

GLM-4.6

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)Winner (+)
9.67%
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+3.0%)
82.9%

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)
N/AInput: N/A | Output: N/A
Speed
N/A
Context WindowLarger
204.8k tokens

Frequently Asked Questions

Pricing data is currently unavailable for one or both of these models, so a direct cost comparison cannot be determined.

Speed metrics are currently unavailable for both models.

GLM-4.6 is better for coding tasks. It scores 9.67% on coding evaluations (swe-bench-pro) compared to GLM-4.5 which scores N/A.

Want to customize weights or add more models?

Open our interactive dashboard where you can adjust your priority levels for speed, budget, or accuracy slider-bars and watch model rankings calculate dynamically.

Customize in Interactive Dashboard