xAIGrok 4.3VSZ.ai (Zhipu AI)GLM-5.1
Our Take
Standardized reasoning and coding benchmarks are currently pending verification for one or both of these models. We recommend testing Grok 4.3 and GLM-5.1 directly in their respective provider playgrounds to see which fits your specific prompt styles best.
Was this recommendation helpful?
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/Acomplex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+3.9%)
90.1%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)1.4x cheaper
$1.56Input: $1.25 | Output: $2.50Context WindowLarger
1.05M tokensBenchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
58.4%complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
86.2%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)
$2.15Input: $1.40 | Output: $4.40Context Window
202.75k tokensFrequently Asked Questions about Grok 4.3 vs GLM-5.1
Grok 4.3 is cheaper than GLM-5.1. Grok 4.3 has a blended cost of $1.56/1M tokens, which is about 1.4x cheaper than GLM-5.1 at $2.15/1M tokens.
Related Matchups
Explore similar comparisons for Grok 4.3 and GLM-5.1.
Do you want to find a model for your constraints?
Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.