whichllmmodel
Back to Dashboard
xAI

Grok 4.20

VS
Z.ai (Zhipu AI)

GLM-5

✍️ Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|📅 Updated: June 2026

Decision Recommendation

⚖️ Editorial Verdict: In our analysis, Grok 4.20 is the premium intelligence choice, scoring 51.8% higher on coding benchmarks. However, this accuracy premium comes with a cost overhead: GLM-5 is 1.9x cheaper to run. If you are building high-volume, simple chatbots or processing massive amounts of text where budget is critical, GLM-5 offers excellent cost savings. For agentic reasoning, code refactoring, or complex logical tasks, the accuracy premium of Grok 4.20 fully justifies the cost.

Model Specs

Grok 4.20

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)Winner (+)
51.8%
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+4.0%)
90%

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)
$3.00Input: $2.00 | Output: $6.00
Speed
233 tps
Context WindowLarger
1M tokens
Model Specs

GLM-5

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/A
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
86%

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)1.9x cheaper
$1.55Input: $1.00 | Output: $3.20
Speed
N/A
Context Window
204.8k tokens

Frequently Asked Questions

GLM-5 is cheaper than Grok 4.20. GLM-5 has a blended cost of $1.55/1M tokens, which is about 1.9x cheaper than Grok 4.20 at $3.00/1M tokens.

Speed data is not available for GLM-5, while Grok 4.20 generates 233 tokens per second.

Grok 4.20 is better for coding tasks. It scores 51.8% on coding evaluations (swe-bench-pro) compared to GLM-5 which scores N/A.

Want to customize weights or add more models?

Open our interactive dashboard where you can adjust your priority levels for speed, budget, or accuracy slider-bars and watch model rankings calculate dynamically.

Customize in Interactive Dashboard