OpenAIGPT-5.5 ProVSZ.ai (Zhipu AI)GLM-4.7
Our Take
Standardized reasoning and coding benchmarks are currently pending verification for one or both of these models. We recommend testing GPT-5.5 Pro and GLM-4.7 directly in their respective provider playgrounds to see which fits your specific prompt styles best.
Was this recommendation helpful?
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/Acomplex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+10.5%)
96.2%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)
$67.50Input: $30.00 | Output: $180.00Context WindowLarger
1.05M tokensBenchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-verified)
73.8%multi-file code and clearly defined tasks
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
85.7%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)67.5x cheaper
$1.00Input: $0.60 | Output: $2.20Context Window
202.75k tokensFrequently Asked Questions about GPT-5.5 Pro vs GLM-4.7
GLM-4.7 is cheaper than GPT-5.5 Pro. GLM-4.7 has a blended cost of $1.00/1M tokens, which is about 67.5x cheaper than GPT-5.5 Pro at $67.50/1M tokens.
Related Matchups
Explore similar comparisons for GPT-5.5 Pro and GLM-4.7.
Do you want to find a model for your constraints?
Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.