OpenAI GPT-5.5 Pro VS OpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna
Decision Recommendation
⚖️ Editorial Verdict: In our analysis, GPT-5.6 Luna is the premium intelligence choice, scoring 62.7% higher on coding benchmarks. It also maintains strong cost efficiency. If you are building high-volume, simple chatbots or processing massive amounts of text where budget is critical, GPT-5.5 Pro offers excellent cost savings. For agentic reasoning, code refactoring, or complex logical tasks, the accuracy premium of GPT-5.6 Luna fully justifies the cost.
Was this recommendation helpful?
Model Specs
GPT-5.5 Pro
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/Aexcellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+3.9%)
96.2%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Performance
Cost (per 1M tokens)
$67.50Input: $30.00 | Output: $180.00Context Window
1.05M tokensModel Specs
GPT-5.6 Luna
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
62.7%excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
92.3%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Performance
Cost (per 1M tokens)30.0x cheaper
$2.25Input: $1.00 | Output: $6.00Context Window
1.05M tokensFrequently Asked Questions about GPT-5.5 Pro vs GPT-5.6 Luna comparison
GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper than GPT-5.5 Pro. GPT-5.6 Luna has a blended cost of $2.25/1M tokens, which is about 30.0x cheaper than GPT-5.5 Pro at $67.50/1M tokens.
GPT-5.6 Luna is better for coding tasks on this benchmark. It scores 62.7% on swe-bench-pro (excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases) compared to GPT-5.5 Pro which scores N/A.
Related Matchups
Explore similar comparisons for GPT-5.5 Pro and GPT-5.6 Luna.