whichllmmodel
Back to Dashboard
OpenAI

GPT-5.4

VS
Z.ai (Zhipu AI)

GLM-5.2

✍️ Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|📅 Updated: June 2026

Decision Recommendation

⚖️ Editorial Verdict: In our analysis, GLM-5.2 is the premium intelligence choice, scoring 4.4% higher on coding benchmarks. However, GPT-5.4 compensates by delivering 1.0x faster throughput. If you are building high-volume, simple chatbots or processing massive amounts of text where budget is critical, GPT-5.4 offers excellent cost savings. For agentic reasoning, code refactoring, or complex logical tasks, the accuracy premium of GLM-5.2 fully justifies the cost.

Model Specs

GPT-5.4

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)
57.7%
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+1.6%)
92.8%

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)
$5.63Input: $2.50 | Output: $15.00
Speed
74 tps
Context WindowLarger
1.05M tokens
Model Specs

GLM-5.2

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)Winner (+4.4%)
62.1%
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
91.2%

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)2.6x cheaper
$2.15Input: $1.40 | Output: $4.40
Speed
N/A
Context Window
1.05M tokens

Frequently Asked Questions

GLM-5.2 is cheaper than GPT-5.4. GLM-5.2 has a blended cost of $2.15/1M tokens, which is about 2.6x cheaper than GPT-5.4 at $5.63/1M tokens.

Speed data is not available for GLM-5.2, while GPT-5.4 generates 74 tokens per second.

GLM-5.2 is better for coding tasks. It scores 62.1% on coding evaluations (swe-bench-pro) compared to GPT-5.4 which scores 57.7%.

Want to customize weights or add more models?

Open our interactive dashboard where you can adjust your priority levels for speed, budget, or accuracy slider-bars and watch model rankings calculate dynamically.

Customize in Interactive Dashboard