OpenAI GPT-5.4 VS OpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna
Decision Recommendation
⚖️ Editorial Verdict: In our analysis, GPT-5.6 Luna is the premium intelligence choice, scoring 5.0% higher on coding benchmarks. It also maintains strong cost efficiency. If you are building high-volume, simple chatbots or processing massive amounts of text where budget is critical, GPT-5.4 offers excellent cost savings. For agentic reasoning, code refactoring, or complex logical tasks, the accuracy premium of GPT-5.6 Luna fully justifies the cost.
Was this recommendation helpful?
Model Specs
GPT-5.4
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
57.7%excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+0.5%)
92.8%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Performance
Cost (per 1M tokens)
$5.63Input: $2.50 | Output: $15.00Context Window
1.05M tokensModel Specs
GPT-5.6 Luna
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)Winner (+5.0%)
62.7%excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
92.3%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Performance
Cost (per 1M tokens)2.5x cheaper
$2.25Input: $1.00 | Output: $6.00Context Window
1.05M tokensFrequently Asked Questions about GPT-5.4 vs GPT-5.6 Luna comparison
GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper than GPT-5.4. GPT-5.6 Luna has a blended cost of $2.25/1M tokens, which is about 2.5x cheaper than GPT-5.4 at $5.63/1M tokens.
GPT-5.6 Luna is better for coding tasks on this benchmark. It scores 62.7% on swe-bench-pro (excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases) compared to GPT-5.4 which scores 57.7%.
Related Matchups
Explore similar comparisons for GPT-5.4 and GPT-5.6 Luna.