OpenAIGPT-5.4 ProVSZ.ai (Zhipu AI)GLM-5
Our Take
Standardized reasoning and coding benchmarks are currently pending verification for one or both of these models. We recommend testing GPT-5.4 Pro and GLM-5 directly in their respective provider playgrounds to see which fits your specific prompt styles best.
Was this recommendation helpful?
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/Acomplex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
67.6%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)11.3x cheaper
$0.14Input: $0.05 | Output: $0.40Context WindowLarger
400k tokensBenchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-verified)
77.8%multi-file code and clearly defined tasks
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+18.4%)
86%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)
$1.55Input: $1.00 | Output: $3.20Context Window
202.75k tokensFrequently Asked Questions about GPT-5.4 Pro vs GLM-5
GPT-5.4 Pro is cheaper than GLM-5. GPT-5.4 Pro has a blended cost of $0.14/1M tokens, which is about 11.3x cheaper than GLM-5 at $1.55/1M tokens.
Related Matchups
Explore similar comparisons for GPT-5.4 Pro and GLM-5.
Do you want to find a model for your constraints?
Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.