OpenAIGPT-5.4 ProVSZ.ai (Zhipu AI)GLM-4.6
Our Take
Standardized reasoning and coding benchmarks are currently pending verification for one or both of these models. We recommend testing GPT-5.4 Pro and GLM-4.6 directly in their respective provider playgrounds to see which fits your specific prompt styles best.
Was this recommendation helpful?
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/Acomplex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
67.6%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)7.3x cheaper
$0.14Input: $0.05 | Output: $0.40Context WindowLarger
400k tokensBenchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-verified)
68%multi-file code and clearly defined tasks
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+15.3%)
82.9%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)
$1.00Input: $0.60 | Output: $2.20Context Window
202.75k tokensFrequently Asked Questions about GPT-5.4 Pro vs GLM-4.6
GPT-5.4 Pro is cheaper than GLM-4.6. GPT-5.4 Pro has a blended cost of $0.14/1M tokens, which is about 7.3x cheaper than GLM-4.6 at $1.00/1M tokens.
Related Matchups
Explore similar comparisons for GPT-5.4 Pro and GLM-4.6.
Do you want to find a model for your constraints?
Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.