whichllmmodel
Back to Dashboard
OpenAI

GPT-5.4 nano

VS
Z.ai (Zhipu AI)

GLM-4.5

✍️ Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|📅 Updated: June 2026

Decision Recommendation

👑 Editorial Verdict: GPT-5.4 nano strictly dominates GLM-4.5 across all major dimensions. It is not only more cost-effective (blended cost of $0.46 vs $1.00 per 1M tokens) but also delivers superior coding accuracy (52.4% vs 0% on SWE-bench) and faster generation speeds (191 tps vs 0 tps). Unless you have platform lock-in, GPT-5.4 nano is the clear and optimal choice for all development workloads.

Model Specs

GPT-5.4 nano

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)Winner (+)
52.4%
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+2.9%)
82.8%

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)2.2x cheaper
$0.46Input: $0.20 | Output: $1.25
Speed
191 tps
Context WindowLarger
400k tokens
Model Specs

GLM-4.5

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/A
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
79.9%

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)
$1.00Input: $0.60 | Output: $2.20
Speed
N/A
Context Window
131.07k tokens

Frequently Asked Questions

GPT-5.4 nano is cheaper than GLM-4.5. GPT-5.4 nano has a blended cost of $0.46/1M tokens, which is about 2.2x cheaper than GLM-4.5 at $1.00/1M tokens.

Speed data is not available for GLM-4.5, while GPT-5.4 nano generates 191 tokens per second.

GPT-5.4 nano is better for coding tasks. It scores 52.4% on coding evaluations (swe-bench-pro) compared to GLM-4.5 which scores N/A.

Want to customize weights or add more models?

Open our interactive dashboard where you can adjust your priority levels for speed, budget, or accuracy slider-bars and watch model rankings calculate dynamically.

Customize in Interactive Dashboard