whichLlmmodel
Back to Dashboard

OpenAIGPT-5 miniVSZ.ai (Zhipu AI)GLM-4.5

Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|Updated: June 2026

Our Take

While these models specialize in different coding tasks: GPT-5 mini is suited for complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning, while GLM-4.5 excels at multi-file code and clearly defined tasks, they share very similar reasoning capabilities. GPT-5 mini is the smarter buy here as it offers the same level of performance while being 1.5x cheaper than GLM-4.5.
WHY?
Benchmark Calculations & Evidence:
  • Coding Evaluation: GPT-5 mini was evaluated on SWE-bench Pro (scoring 45.7%), while GLM-4.5 was evaluated on SWE-bench Verified (scoring 64.2%).
  • Reasoning Accuracy: Both models were evaluated on the GPQA Diamond benchmark. GPT-5 mini scored 81.6%, while GLM-4.5 scored 79.9%.
  • Cost Ratio: GLM-4.5 blended CPM is 1.5x higher than GPT-5 mini.
  • Was this recommendation helpful?
    Model Specs

    GPT-5 mini

    Benchmarks & Scores

    Coding (swe-bench-pro)
    45.7%

    complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning

    Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+1.7%)
    81.6%

    graduate-level science QA

    Cost & Context

    Cost (per 1M tokens)1.5x cheaper
    $0.69Input: $0.25 | Output: $2.00
    Context WindowLarger
    400k tokens
    Model Specs

    GLM-4.5

    Open SourceAPI Available

    Benchmarks & Scores

    Coding (swe-bench-verified)
    64.2%

    multi-file code and clearly defined tasks

    Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
    79.9%

    graduate-level science QA

    Cost & Context

    Cost (per 1M tokens)
    $1.00Input: $0.60 | Output: $2.20
    Context Window
    131.07k tokens

    Frequently Asked Questions about GPT-5 mini vs GLM-4.5

    GPT-5 mini is cheaper than GLM-4.5. GPT-5 mini has a blended cost of $0.69/1M tokens, which is about 1.5x cheaper than GLM-4.5 at $1.00/1M tokens.

    For coding tasks, GPT-5 mini scores 45.7% on swe-bench-pro (complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning), while GLM-4.5 scores 64.2% on swe-bench-verified (multi-file code and clearly defined tasks).

    Do you want to find a model for your constraints?

    Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.

    Open Model Finder