OpenAIGPT-5 miniVSOpenAIGPT-5.4 Pro
Our Take
Standardized reasoning and coding benchmarks are currently pending verification for one or both of these models. We recommend testing GPT-5 mini and GPT-5.4 Pro directly in their respective provider playgrounds to see which fits your specific prompt styles best.
Was this recommendation helpful?
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
45.7%complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+14.0%)
81.6%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)
$0.69Input: $0.25 | Output: $2.00Context Window
400k tokensBenchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/Acomplex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
67.6%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)5.0x cheaper
$0.14Input: $0.05 | Output: $0.40Context Window
400k tokensFrequently Asked Questions about GPT-5 mini vs GPT-5.4 Pro
GPT-5.4 Pro is cheaper than GPT-5 mini. GPT-5.4 Pro has a blended cost of $0.14/1M tokens, which is about 5.0x cheaper than GPT-5 mini at $0.69/1M tokens.
Related Matchups
Explore similar comparisons for GPT-5 mini and GPT-5.4 Pro.
Do you want to find a model for your constraints?
Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.