Moonshot AI (Kimi)Kimi K3VSZ.ai (Zhipu AI)GLM-5.1
Our Take
Standardized reasoning and coding benchmarks are currently pending verification for one or both of these models. We recommend testing Kimi K3 and GLM-5.1 directly in their respective provider playgrounds to see which fits your specific prompt styles best.
Was this recommendation helpful?
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/Aexcellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+7.3%)
93.5%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)1.3x cheaper
$1.71Input: $0.95 | Output: $4.00Context WindowLarger
262.14k tokensBenchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
58.4%excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
86.2%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)
$2.15Input: $1.40 | Output: $4.40Context Window
202.75k tokensFrequently Asked Questions about Kimi K3 vs GLM-5.1
Kimi K3 is cheaper than GLM-5.1. Kimi K3 has a blended cost of $1.71/1M tokens, which is about 1.3x cheaper than GLM-5.1 at $2.15/1M tokens.
Related Matchups
Explore similar comparisons for Kimi K3 and GLM-5.1.
Do you want to find a model for your constraints?
Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.