Moonshot AI (Kimi)Kimi K3VSZ.ai (Zhipu AI)GLM-4.5
Our Take
Standardized reasoning and coding benchmarks are currently pending verification for one or both of these models. We recommend testing Kimi K3 and GLM-4.5 directly in their respective provider playgrounds to see which fits your specific prompt styles best.
Was this recommendation helpful?
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/Aexcellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+13.6%)
93.5%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)
$1.71Input: $0.95 | Output: $4.00Context WindowLarger
262.14k tokensBenchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-verified)
64.2%good at editing existing code, cross-file updates, and multi-component systems
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
79.9%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)1.7x cheaper
$1.00Input: $0.60 | Output: $2.20Context Window
131.07k tokensFrequently Asked Questions about Kimi K3 vs GLM-4.5
GLM-4.5 is cheaper than Kimi K3. GLM-4.5 has a blended cost of $1.00/1M tokens, which is about 1.7x cheaper than Kimi K3 at $1.71/1M tokens.
Related Matchups
Explore similar comparisons for Kimi K3 and GLM-4.5.
Do you want to find a model for your constraints?
Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.