whichLlmmodel
Back to Dashboard

Moonshot AI (Kimi)Kimi K2.7 CodeVSMoonshot AI (Kimi)Kimi K3

Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|Updated: June 2026

Our Take

Standardized reasoning and coding benchmarks are currently pending verification for one or both of these models. We recommend testing Kimi K2.7 Code and Kimi K3 directly in their respective provider playgrounds to see which fits your specific prompt styles best.
Was this recommendation helpful?
Model Specs

Kimi K2.7 Code

Open SourceAPI Available

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)
58.6%

excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases

Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
90%

graduate-level science QA

Cost & Context

Cost (per 1M tokens)
$1.71Input: $0.95 | Output: $4.00
Context Window
262.14k tokens
Model Specs

Kimi K3

Open SourceAPI Available

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/A

excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases

Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+3.5%)
93.5%

graduate-level science QA

Cost & Context

Cost (per 1M tokens)
$1.71Input: $0.95 | Output: $4.00
Context Window
262.14k tokens

Frequently Asked Questions about Kimi K2.7 Code vs Kimi K3

Both Kimi K2.7 Code and Kimi K3 cost the same, with a blended cost of $1.71 per 1 million tokens.

Do you want to find a model for your constraints?

Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.

Open Model Finder