Moonshot AI (Kimi)kimi-k2.6VSOpenAIGPT-5.5 Pro
Our Take
Standardized reasoning and coding benchmarks are currently pending verification for one or both of these models. We recommend testing kimi-k2.6 and GPT-5.5 Pro directly in their respective provider playgrounds to see which fits your specific prompt styles best.
Was this recommendation helpful?
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
58.6%complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
90.5%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)39.4x cheaper
$1.71Input: $0.95 | Output: $4.00Context Window
262.14k tokensBenchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/Acomplex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+5.7%)
96.2%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)
$67.50Input: $30.00 | Output: $180.00Context WindowLarger
1.05M tokensFrequently Asked Questions about kimi-k2.6 vs GPT-5.5 Pro
kimi-k2.6 is cheaper than GPT-5.5 Pro. kimi-k2.6 has a blended cost of $1.71/1M tokens, which is about 39.4x cheaper than GPT-5.5 Pro at $67.50/1M tokens.
Related Matchups
Explore similar comparisons for kimi-k2.6 and GPT-5.5 Pro.
Do you want to find a model for your constraints?
Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.