Moonshot AI (Kimi)kimi-k2.6VSMoonshot AI (Kimi)Kimi K3
Our Take
Standardized reasoning and coding benchmarks are currently pending verification for one or both of these models. We recommend testing kimi-k2.6 and Kimi K3 directly in their respective provider playgrounds to see which fits your specific prompt styles best.
Was this recommendation helpful?
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
58.6%excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
90.5%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)
$1.71Input: $0.95 | Output: $4.00Context Window
262.14k tokensBenchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/Aexcellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+3.0%)
93.5%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)
$1.71Input: $0.95 | Output: $4.00Context Window
262.14k tokensFrequently Asked Questions about kimi-k2.6 vs Kimi K3
Both kimi-k2.6 and Kimi K3 cost the same, with a blended cost of $1.71 per 1 million tokens.
Related Matchups
Explore similar comparisons for kimi-k2.6 and Kimi K3.
Do you want to find a model for your constraints?
Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.