Moonshot AI (Kimi)
kimi-k2.6
VS
Moonshot AI (Kimi)
Kimi K2.7 Code
Decision Recommendation
👑 Editorial Verdict: kimi-k2.6 strictly dominates Kimi K2.7 Code across all compared dimensions. It is not only more cost-effective (blended cost of $1.71 vs $1.71 per 1M tokens) but also delivers superior coding accuracy (58.6% vs 58.6% on SWE-bench). Unless you have platform lock-in, kimi-k2.6 is the clear and optimal choice for all development workloads.
Model Specs
kimi-k2.6
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
58.6%Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+)
90.5%Cost & Performance
Cost (per 1M tokens)
$1.71Input: $0.95 | Output: $4.00Context Window
262.14k tokensModel Specs
Kimi K2.7 Code
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
58.6%Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
N/ACost & Performance
Cost (per 1M tokens)
$1.71Input: $0.95 | Output: $4.00Context Window
262.14k tokensFrequently Asked Questions
Both kimi-k2.6 and Kimi K2.7 Code cost the same, with a blended cost of $1.71 per 1 million tokens.
Both kimi-k2.6 and Kimi K2.7 Code score identically at 58.6% on coding evaluations.
Want to customize weights or add more models?
Open our interactive dashboard where you can adjust your priority levels for speed, budget, or accuracy slider-bars and watch model rankings calculate dynamically.
Customize in Interactive Dashboard