Moonshot AI (Kimi)kimi-k2.5VSMoonshot AI (Kimi)Kimi K3
Our Take
Standardized reasoning and coding benchmarks are currently pending verification for one or both of these models. We recommend testing kimi-k2.5 and Kimi K3 directly in their respective provider playgrounds to see which fits your specific prompt styles best.
Was this recommendation helpful?
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
50.7%excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
87.6%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)1.4x cheaper
$1.20Input: $0.60 | Output: $3.00Context Window
262.14k tokensBenchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/Aexcellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+5.9%)
93.5%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)
$1.71Input: $0.95 | Output: $4.00Context Window
262.14k tokensFrequently Asked Questions about kimi-k2.5 vs Kimi K3
kimi-k2.5 is cheaper than Kimi K3. kimi-k2.5 has a blended cost of $1.20/1M tokens, which is about 1.4x cheaper than Kimi K3 at $1.71/1M tokens.
Related Matchups
Explore similar comparisons for kimi-k2.5 and Kimi K3.
Do you want to find a model for your constraints?
Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.