whichllmmodel
Back to Dashboard
Mistral AI

odestral 22B v0.1

VS
OpenAI

GPT-5.4 nano

✍️ Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|📅 Updated: June 2026

Decision Recommendation

⚖️ Editorial Verdict: In our analysis, GPT-5.4 nano is the premium intelligence choice, scoring 52.4% higher on coding benchmarks. However, this accuracy premium comes with a cost overhead: odestral 22B v0.1 is 1.0x cheaper to run and delivers 1.0x faster throughput. If you are building high-volume, simple chatbots or processing massive amounts of text where budget is critical, odestral 22B v0.1 offers excellent cost savings. For agentic reasoning, code refactoring, or complex logical tasks, the accuracy premium of GPT-5.4 nano fully justifies the cost.

Model Specs

odestral 22B v0.1

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/A
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
N/A

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)
N/AInput: N/A | Output: N/A
Speed
200 tps
Context Window
32.77k tokens
Model Specs

GPT-5.4 nano

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)Winner (+)
52.4%
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+)
82.8%

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)
$0.46Input: $0.20 | Output: $1.25
Speed
191 tps
Context WindowLarger
400k tokens
Read our data collection methodology

Frequently Asked Questions

Pricing data is currently unavailable for one or both of these models, so a direct cost comparison cannot be determined.

odestral 22B v0.1 is faster than GPT-5.4 nano. odestral 22B v0.1 generates 200 tokens per second (tps) compared to GPT-5.4 nano which generates 191 tokens per second.

GPT-5.4 nano is better for coding tasks. It scores 52.4% on coding evaluations (swe-bench-pro) compared to odestral 22B v0.1 which scores N/A.

Want to customize weights or add more models?

Open our interactive dashboard where you can adjust your priority levels for speed, budget, or accuracy slider-bars and watch model rankings calculate dynamically.

Customize in Interactive Dashboard