Mistral AIMixtral 8x22B v0.1VSMistral AIMixtral 8x7B v0.1
Our Take
Standardized reasoning and coding benchmarks are currently pending verification for one or both of these models. We recommend testing Mixtral 8x22B v0.1 and Mixtral 8x7B v0.1 directly in their respective provider playgrounds to see which fits your specific prompt styles best.
Was this recommendation helpful?
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (human-eval)Winner (+4.9%)
45.1%basic standalone code completion and simple functions
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
N/Agraduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)
Self HostLocal execution (zero API fees)Context WindowLarger
65.54k tokensBenchmarks & Scores
Coding (human-eval)
40.2%basic standalone code completion and simple functions
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
N/Agraduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)
Self HostLocal execution (zero API fees)Context Window
32.77k tokensFrequently Asked Questions about Mixtral 8x22B v0.1 vs Mixtral 8x7B v0.1
Mixtral 8x22B v0.1 is better for coding tasks on this benchmark. It scores 45.1% on human-eval (basic standalone code completion and simple functions) compared to Mixtral 8x7B v0.1 which scores 40.2%.
Related Matchups
Explore similar comparisons for Mixtral 8x22B v0.1 and Mixtral 8x7B v0.1.
Do you want to find a model for your constraints?
Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.