whichLlmmodel
Back to Dashboard

Mistral AIMistral Small 4VSOpenAIGPT-5.4

Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|Updated: June 2026

Our Take

We recommend GPT-5.4 if you need peak intelligence for complex complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning, or the 21.4x cheaper Mistral Small 4 if your workflow is limited to scripting single-file apps or clearly defined functions. While GPT-5.4 holds a major reasoning advantage, Mistral Small 4 is optimized for high-volume budget pipelines. Choose GPT-5.4 for architectural codebase planning, or Mistral Small 4 to maximize your budget for basic scripts.
WHY?
Benchmark Calculations & Evidence:
  • Coding Evaluation: Mistral Small 4 was evaluated on LiveCodeBench (scoring 63.6%), while GPT-5.4 was evaluated on SWE-bench Pro (scoring 57.7%).
  • Reasoning Accuracy: Both models were evaluated on the GPQA Diamond benchmark. GPT-5.4 scored 92.8%, while Mistral Small 4 scored 71.2%.
  • Cost Efficiency: Mistral Small 4 pricing ($0.15/M input, $0.6/M output) is 21.4x cheaper than GPT-5.4 ($2.5/M input, $15/M output).
  • Was this recommendation helpful?
    Model Specs

    Mistral Small 4

    Open SourceAPI Available

    Benchmarks & Scores

    Coding (live-code-bench)
    63.6%

    scripting single-file apps or clearly defined functions

    Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
    71.2%

    graduate-level science QA

    Cost & Context

    Cost (per 1M tokens)21.4x cheaper
    $0.26Input: $0.15 | Output: $0.60
    Context Window
    262.14k tokens
    Model Specs

    GPT-5.4

    Benchmarks & Scores

    Coding (swe-bench-pro)
    57.7%

    complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning

    Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+21.6%)
    92.8%

    graduate-level science QA

    Cost & Context

    Cost (per 1M tokens)
    $5.63Input: $2.50 | Output: $15.00
    Context WindowLarger
    1.05M tokens

    Frequently Asked Questions about Mistral Small 4 vs GPT-5.4

    Mistral Small 4 is cheaper than GPT-5.4. Mistral Small 4 has a blended cost of $0.26/1M tokens, which is about 21.4x cheaper than GPT-5.4 at $5.63/1M tokens.

    For coding tasks, Mistral Small 4 scores 63.6% on live-code-bench (scripting single-file apps or clearly defined functions), while GPT-5.4 scores 57.7% on swe-bench-pro (complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning).

    Do you want to find a model for your constraints?

    Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.

    Open Model Finder