Mistral AIMistral Medium 3.5VSZ.ai (Zhipu AI)GLM-5
Our Take
Standardized reasoning and coding benchmarks are currently pending verification for one or both of these models. We recommend testing Mistral Medium 3.5 and GLM-5 directly in their respective provider playgrounds to see which fits your specific prompt styles best.
Was this recommendation helpful?
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/Acomplex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
N/Agraduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)
$3.00Input: $1.50 | Output: $7.50Context WindowLarger
262.14k tokensBenchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-verified)
77.8%multi-file code and clearly defined tasks
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
86%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)1.9x cheaper
$1.55Input: $1.00 | Output: $3.20Context Window
202.75k tokensFrequently Asked Questions about Mistral Medium 3.5 vs GLM-5
GLM-5 is cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.5. GLM-5 has a blended cost of $1.55/1M tokens, which is about 1.9x cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.5 at $3.00/1M tokens.
Related Matchups
Explore similar comparisons for Mistral Medium 3.5 and GLM-5.
Do you want to find a model for your constraints?
Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.