Mistral AIMistral Medium 3.5VSZ.ai (Zhipu AI)GLM-4.5
Our Take
Standardized reasoning and coding benchmarks are currently pending verification for one or both of these models. We recommend testing Mistral Medium 3.5 and GLM-4.5 directly in their respective provider playgrounds to see which fits your specific prompt styles best.
Was this recommendation helpful?
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/Acomplex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
N/Agraduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)
$3.00Input: $1.50 | Output: $7.50Context WindowLarger
262.14k tokensBenchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-verified)
64.2%multi-file code and clearly defined tasks
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
79.9%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)3.0x cheaper
$1.00Input: $0.60 | Output: $2.20Context Window
131.07k tokensFrequently Asked Questions about Mistral Medium 3.5 vs GLM-4.5
GLM-4.5 is cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.5. GLM-4.5 has a blended cost of $1.00/1M tokens, which is about 3.0x cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.5 at $3.00/1M tokens.
Related Matchups
Explore similar comparisons for Mistral Medium 3.5 and GLM-4.5.
Do you want to find a model for your constraints?
Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.