Mistral AIMistral Medium 3.5VSOpenAIGPT-5.4 nano
Our Take
Standardized reasoning and coding benchmarks are currently pending verification for one or both of these models. We recommend testing Mistral Medium 3.5 and GPT-5.4 nano directly in their respective provider playgrounds to see which fits your specific prompt styles best.
Was this recommendation helpful?
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/Acomplex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
N/Agraduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)
$3.00Input: $1.50 | Output: $7.50Context Window
262.14k tokensBenchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
52.4%complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
82.8%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)6.5x cheaper
$0.46Input: $0.20 | Output: $1.25Context WindowLarger
400k tokensFrequently Asked Questions about Mistral Medium 3.5 vs GPT-5.4 nano
GPT-5.4 nano is cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.5. GPT-5.4 nano has a blended cost of $0.46/1M tokens, which is about 6.5x cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.5 at $3.00/1M tokens.
Related Matchups
Explore similar comparisons for Mistral Medium 3.5 and GPT-5.4 nano.
Do you want to find a model for your constraints?
Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.