whichllmmodel
Back to Dashboard
Mistral AI

Mistral Medium 3.5

VS
Mistral AI

odestral 22B v0.1

✍️ Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|📅 Updated: June 2026

Decision Recommendation

📊 Editorial Verdict: Mistral Medium 3.5 and odestral 22B v0.1 offer nearly identical benchmark scores. However, both models share a very similar pricing profile. If you need real-time responsiveness, compare their generation speeds below to select the engine that best aligns with your application's user experience requirements.

Model Specs

Mistral Medium 3.5

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/A
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
N/A

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)
N/AInput: N/A | Output: N/A
Speed
180 tps
Context WindowLarger
262.14k tokens
Model Specs

odestral 22B v0.1

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/A
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
N/A

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)
N/AInput: N/A | Output: N/A
Speed1.1x faster
200 tps
Context Window
32.77k tokens
Read our data collection methodology

Frequently Asked Questions

Pricing data is currently unavailable for one or both of these models, so a direct cost comparison cannot be determined.

odestral 22B v0.1 is faster than Mistral Medium 3.5. odestral 22B v0.1 generates 200 tokens per second (tps) compared to Mistral Medium 3.5 which generates 180 tokens per second.

Coding benchmark scores are not currently recorded for these models.

Want to customize weights or add more models?

Open our interactive dashboard where you can adjust your priority levels for speed, budget, or accuracy slider-bars and watch model rankings calculate dynamically.

Customize in Interactive Dashboard