Mistral AIMistral Large 3VSOpenAIGPT-5.4 Pro
Our Take
Standardized reasoning and coding benchmarks are currently pending verification for one or both of these models. We recommend testing Mistral Large 3 and GPT-5.4 Pro directly in their respective provider playgrounds to see which fits your specific prompt styles best.
Was this recommendation helpful?
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (live-code-bench)
34.4%scripting single-file apps or clearly defined functions
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+17.9%)
85.5%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)
$0.75Input: $0.50 | Output: $1.50Context Window
262.14k tokensBenchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/Acomplex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
67.6%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)5.5x cheaper
$0.14Input: $0.05 | Output: $0.40Context WindowLarger
400k tokensFrequently Asked Questions about Mistral Large 3 vs GPT-5.4 Pro
GPT-5.4 Pro is cheaper than Mistral Large 3. GPT-5.4 Pro has a blended cost of $0.14/1M tokens, which is about 5.5x cheaper than Mistral Large 3 at $0.75/1M tokens.
Related Matchups
Explore similar comparisons for Mistral Large 3 and GPT-5.4 Pro.
Do you want to find a model for your constraints?
Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.