Mistral AIMinistral 3 14BVSMistral AIMistral Small 4
Our Take
Standardized reasoning and coding benchmarks are currently pending verification for one or both of these models. We recommend testing Ministral 3 14B and Mistral Small 4 directly in their respective provider playgrounds to see which fits your specific prompt styles best.
Was this recommendation helpful?
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/Acomplex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
N/Agraduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)1.3x cheaper
$0.20Input: $0.20 | Output: $0.20Context Window
262.14k tokensBenchmarks & Scores
Coding (live-code-bench)
63.6%scripting single-file apps or clearly defined functions
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
71.2%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)
$0.26Input: $0.15 | Output: $0.60Context Window
262.14k tokensFrequently Asked Questions about Ministral 3 14B vs Mistral Small 4
Ministral 3 14B is cheaper than Mistral Small 4. Ministral 3 14B has a blended cost of $0.20/1M tokens, which is about 1.3x cheaper than Mistral Small 4 at $0.26/1M tokens.
Related Matchups
Explore similar comparisons for Ministral 3 14B and Mistral Small 4.
Do you want to find a model for your constraints?
Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.