Mistral AIMinistral 3 14BVSMistral AIMistral Large 3
Our Take
Standardized reasoning and coding benchmarks are currently pending verification for one or both of these models. We recommend testing Ministral 3 14B and Mistral Large 3 directly in their respective provider playgrounds to see which fits your specific prompt styles best.
Was this recommendation helpful?
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/Acomplex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
N/Agraduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)3.8x cheaper
$0.20Input: $0.20 | Output: $0.20Context Window
262.14k tokensBenchmarks & Scores
Coding (live-code-bench)
34.4%scripting single-file apps or clearly defined functions
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
85.5%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)
$0.75Input: $0.50 | Output: $1.50Context Window
262.14k tokensFrequently Asked Questions about Ministral 3 14B vs Mistral Large 3
Ministral 3 14B is cheaper than Mistral Large 3. Ministral 3 14B has a blended cost of $0.20/1M tokens, which is about 3.8x cheaper than Mistral Large 3 at $0.75/1M tokens.
Related Matchups
Explore similar comparisons for Ministral 3 14B and Mistral Large 3.
Do you want to find a model for your constraints?
Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.