Mistral AI Codestral 22B VS xAI Grok 4.5
📊Our Take
Standardized reasoning and coding benchmarks are currently pending verification for one or both of these models. We recommend testing Codestral 22B and Grok 4.5 directly in their respective provider playgrounds to see which fits your specific prompt styles best.
Was this recommendation helpful?
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (human-eval)
81.1%good at code completion, standalone functions, and basic algorithms
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
N/Agraduate-level science QA
Cost & Performance
Cost (per 1M tokens)6.7x cheaper
$0.45Input: $0.30 | Output: $0.90Context Window
32.77k tokensBenchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
64.7%excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
93%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Performance
Cost (per 1M tokens)
$3.00Input: $2.00 | Output: $6.00Context WindowLarger
500k tokensFrequently Asked Questions about Codestral 22B vs Grok 4.5 comparison
Codestral 22B is cheaper than Grok 4.5. Codestral 22B has a blended cost of $0.45/1M tokens, which is about 6.7x cheaper than Grok 4.5 at $3.00/1M tokens.
For coding tasks, Codestral 22B scores 81.1% on human-eval (good at code completion, standalone functions, and basic algorithms), while Grok 4.5 scores 64.7% on swe-bench-pro (excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases).
Related Matchups
Explore similar comparisons for Codestral 22B and Grok 4.5.