whichllmmodel
Back to Dashboard
Mistral AI

Codestral 22B

VS
Mistral AI

Mistral Medium 3.5

✍️ Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|📅 Updated: June 2026

Decision Recommendation

📊 Editorial Verdict: Codestral 22B and Mistral Medium 3.5 offer nearly identical benchmark scores. However, Codestral 22B offers a key advantage by being 6.7x cheaper ($0.45 vs $3.00 per 1M tokens). Select the engine that best aligns with your application's requirements.

Model Specs

Codestral 22B

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/A
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
N/A

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)6.7x cheaper
$0.45Input: $0.30 | Output: $0.90
Context Window
32.77k tokens
Model Specs

Mistral Medium 3.5

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/A
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
N/A

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)
$3.00Input: $1.50 | Output: $7.50
Context WindowLarger
262.14k tokens

Frequently Asked Questions

Codestral 22B is cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.5. Codestral 22B has a blended cost of $0.45/1M tokens, which is about 6.7x cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.5 at $3.00/1M tokens.

Coding benchmark scores are not currently recorded for these models.

Want to customize weights or add more models?

Open our interactive dashboard where you can adjust your priority levels for speed, budget, or accuracy slider-bars and watch model rankings calculate dynamically.

Customize in Interactive Dashboard