Meta Muse Spark 1.1 VS Z.ai (Zhipu AI) GLM-5.1
Decision Recommendation
👑 Editorial Verdict: Muse Spark 1.1 strictly dominates GLM-5.1 across all compared dimensions. It is not only more cost-effective (blended cost of $2.00 vs $2.15 per 1M tokens) but also delivers superior coding accuracy (61.5% vs 58.4% on SWE-bench). Unless you have platform lock-in, Muse Spark 1.1 is the clear and optimal choice for all development workloads.
Was this recommendation helpful?
Model Specs
Muse Spark 1.1
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)Winner (+3.1%)
61.5%excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+5.0%)
91.16%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Performance
Cost (per 1M tokens)1.1x cheaper
$2.00Input: $1.25 | Output: $4.25Context WindowLarger
1.05M tokensModel Specs
GLM-5.1
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
58.4%excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
86.2%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Performance
Cost (per 1M tokens)
$2.15Input: $1.40 | Output: $4.40Context Window
204.8k tokensFrequently Asked Questions about Muse Spark 1.1 vs GLM-5.1 comparison
Muse Spark 1.1 is cheaper than GLM-5.1. Muse Spark 1.1 has a blended cost of $2.00/1M tokens, which is about 1.1x cheaper than GLM-5.1 at $2.15/1M tokens.
Muse Spark 1.1 is better for coding tasks on this benchmark. It scores 61.5% on swe-bench-pro (excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases) compared to GLM-5.1 which scores 58.4%.
Related Matchups
Explore similar comparisons for Muse Spark 1.1 and GLM-5.1.