Meta Muse Spark 1.1 VS xAI Grok 4.5
⚖️Our Take
Both models perform almost identically, with an average score gap of just 2.5%. We recommend choosing Muse Spark 1.1 as it is the more cost-effective option (being 1.5x cheaper) without sacrificing any real-world capability.
Was this recommendation helpful?
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
61.5%excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
91.16%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Performance
Cost (per 1M tokens)1.5x cheaper
$2.00Input: $1.25 | Output: $4.25Context WindowLarger
1.05M tokensBenchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)Winner (+3.2%)
64.7%excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+1.8%)
93%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Performance
Cost (per 1M tokens)
$3.00Input: $2.00 | Output: $6.00Context Window
500k tokensFrequently Asked Questions about Muse Spark 1.1 vs Grok 4.5 comparison
Muse Spark 1.1 is cheaper than Grok 4.5. Muse Spark 1.1 has a blended cost of $2.00/1M tokens, which is about 1.5x cheaper than Grok 4.5 at $3.00/1M tokens.
Grok 4.5 is better for coding tasks on this benchmark. It scores 64.7% on swe-bench-pro (excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases) compared to Muse Spark 1.1 which scores 61.5%.
Related Matchups
Explore similar comparisons for Muse Spark 1.1 and Grok 4.5.