Meta Muse Spark 1.1 VS xAI Grok 4.3
Decision Recommendation
⚖️ Editorial Verdict: In our analysis, Muse Spark 1.1 is the premium intelligence choice, scoring 61.5% higher on coding benchmarks. However, this accuracy premium comes with a cost overhead: Grok 4.3 is 1.3x cheaper to run. If you are building high-volume, simple chatbots or processing massive amounts of text where budget is critical, Grok 4.3 offers excellent cost savings. For agentic reasoning, code refactoring, or complex logical tasks, the accuracy premium of Muse Spark 1.1 fully justifies the cost.
Was this recommendation helpful?
Model Specs
Muse Spark 1.1
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
61.5%excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+1.1%)
91.16%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Performance
Cost (per 1M tokens)
$2.00Input: $1.25 | Output: $4.25Context WindowLarger
1.05M tokensModel Specs
Grok 4.3
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/Aexcellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
90.1%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Performance
Cost (per 1M tokens)1.3x cheaper
$1.56Input: $1.25 | Output: $2.50Context Window
1M tokensFrequently Asked Questions about Muse Spark 1.1 vs Grok 4.3 comparison
Grok 4.3 is cheaper than Muse Spark 1.1. Grok 4.3 has a blended cost of $1.56/1M tokens, which is about 1.3x cheaper than Muse Spark 1.1 at $2.00/1M tokens.
Muse Spark 1.1 is better for coding tasks on this benchmark. It scores 61.5% on swe-bench-pro (excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases) compared to Grok 4.3 which scores N/A.
Related Matchups
Explore similar comparisons for Muse Spark 1.1 and Grok 4.3.