Meta Muse Spark 1.1 VS xAI Grok 4.20
Decision Recommendation
👑 Editorial Verdict: Muse Spark 1.1 strictly dominates Grok 4.20 across all compared dimensions. It is not only more cost-effective (blended cost of $2.00 vs $3.00 per 1M tokens) but also delivers superior coding accuracy (61.5% vs 51.8% on SWE-bench). Unless you have platform lock-in, Muse Spark 1.1 is the clear and optimal choice for all development workloads.
Was this recommendation helpful?
Model Specs
Muse Spark 1.1
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)Winner (+9.7%)
61.5%excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+1.2%)
91.16%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Performance
Cost (per 1M tokens)1.5x cheaper
$2.00Input: $1.25 | Output: $4.25Context WindowLarger
1.05M tokensModel Specs
Grok 4.20
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
51.8%excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
90%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Performance
Cost (per 1M tokens)
$3.00Input: $2.00 | Output: $6.00Context Window
1M tokensFrequently Asked Questions about Muse Spark 1.1 vs Grok 4.20 comparison
Muse Spark 1.1 is cheaper than Grok 4.20. Muse Spark 1.1 has a blended cost of $2.00/1M tokens, which is about 1.5x cheaper than Grok 4.20 at $3.00/1M tokens.
Muse Spark 1.1 is better for coding tasks on this benchmark. It scores 61.5% on swe-bench-pro (excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases) compared to Grok 4.20 which scores 51.8%.
Related Matchups
Explore similar comparisons for Muse Spark 1.1 and Grok 4.20.