whichllmmodel
Back to Dashboard

Meta Muse Spark 1.1 VS OpenAI GPT-5.4 Pro

✍️ Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|📅 Updated: June 2026

Decision Recommendation

⚖️ Editorial Verdict: In our analysis, Muse Spark 1.1 is the premium intelligence choice, scoring 61.5% higher on coding benchmarks. However, this accuracy premium comes with a cost overhead: GPT-5.4 Pro is 14.5x cheaper to run. If you are building high-volume, simple chatbots or processing massive amounts of text where budget is critical, GPT-5.4 Pro offers excellent cost savings. For agentic reasoning, code refactoring, or complex logical tasks, the accuracy premium of Muse Spark 1.1 fully justifies the cost.
Was this recommendation helpful?
Model Specs

Muse Spark 1.1

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)
61.5%

excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases

Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+23.6%)
91.16%

graduate-level science QA

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)
$2.00Input: $1.25 | Output: $4.25
Context WindowLarger
1.05M tokens
Model Specs

GPT-5.4 Pro

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/A

excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases

Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
67.6%

graduate-level science QA

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)14.5x cheaper
$0.14Input: $0.05 | Output: $0.40
Context Window
400k tokens

Frequently Asked Questions about Muse Spark 1.1 vs GPT-5.4 Pro comparison

GPT-5.4 Pro is cheaper than Muse Spark 1.1. GPT-5.4 Pro has a blended cost of $0.14/1M tokens, which is about 14.5x cheaper than Muse Spark 1.1 at $2.00/1M tokens.

Muse Spark 1.1 is better for coding tasks on this benchmark. It scores 61.5% on swe-bench-pro (excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases) compared to GPT-5.4 Pro which scores N/A.