whichllmmodel
Back to Dashboard
Meta

Llama-3.3-70B

VS
Mistral AI

Mistral Large 3

✍️ Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|📅 Updated: June 2026

Decision Recommendation

👑 Editorial Verdict: Mistral Large 3 strictly dominates Llama-3.3-70B across all major dimensions. It is not only more cost-effective (blended cost of $0.00 vs $0.00 per 1M tokens) but also delivers superior coding accuracy (0% vs 0% on SWE-bench) and faster generation speeds (220 tps vs 193 tps). Unless you have platform lock-in, Mistral Large 3 is the clear and optimal choice for all development workloads.

Model Specs

Llama-3.3-70B

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/A
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
50.5%

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)
N/AInput: N/A | Output: N/A
Speed
193 tps
Context Window
131.07k tokens
Model Specs

Mistral Large 3

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/A
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+35.0%)
85.5%

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)
N/AInput: N/A | Output: N/A
Speed1.1x faster
220 tps
Context WindowLarger
262.14k tokens

Frequently Asked Questions

Pricing data is currently unavailable for one or both of these models, so a direct cost comparison cannot be determined.

Mistral Large 3 is faster than Llama-3.3-70B. Mistral Large 3 generates 220 tokens per second (tps) compared to Llama-3.3-70B which generates 193 tokens per second.

Coding benchmark scores are not currently recorded for these models.

Want to customize weights or add more models?

Open our interactive dashboard where you can adjust your priority levels for speed, budget, or accuracy slider-bars and watch model rankings calculate dynamically.

Customize in Interactive Dashboard