whichLlmmodel
Back to Dashboard

MetaLlama-3.1 8BVSOpenAIGPT-5.4

Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|Updated: June 2026

Our Take

We recommend GPT-5.4 if you need peak intelligence and a much larger context window for full-repo analysis, or the free Llama-3.1 8B if you want zero API costs and total offline privacy. While GPT-5.4 offers superior reasoning capability, Llama-3.1 8B runs entirely on your own local hardware. Choose GPT-5.4 for repository-scale analysis, or Llama-3.1 8B for zero-cost offline privacy and basic standalone code completion and simple functions.
WHY?
Benchmark Calculations & Evidence:
  • Reasoning Accuracy: Both models were evaluated on the GPQA Diamond benchmark. GPT-5.4 scored 92.8%, while Llama-3.1 8B scored 30.4% (+62.4% gap).
  • Coding Performance: Evaluated on different benchmarks. Llama-3.1 8B scored 72.6% on HumanEval (basic standalone code completion and simple functions), while GPT-5.4 scored 57.7% on SWE-bench Pro (complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning).
  • Context Window: GPT-5.4 supports a 1M context window, while Llama-3.1 8B supports 131k.
  • Hosting Model: Llama-3.1 8B runs locally for $0 API costs, while GPT-5.4 is a cloud API.
  • Was this recommendation helpful?
    Model Specs

    Llama-3.1 8B

    Open Source

    Benchmarks & Scores

    Coding (human-eval)
    72.6%

    basic standalone code completion and simple functions

    Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
    30.4%

    graduate-level science QA

    Cost & Context

    Cost (per 1M tokens)
    Self HostLocal execution (zero API fees)
    Context Window
    131.07k tokens
    Model Specs

    GPT-5.4

    Benchmarks & Scores

    Coding (swe-bench-pro)
    57.7%

    complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning

    Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+62.4%)
    92.8%

    graduate-level science QA

    Cost & Context

    Cost (per 1M tokens)
    $5.63Input: $2.50 | Output: $15.00
    Context WindowLarger
    1.05M tokens

    Frequently Asked Questions about Llama-3.1 8B vs GPT-5.4

    For coding tasks, Llama-3.1 8B scores 72.6% on human-eval (basic standalone code completion and simple functions), while GPT-5.4 scores 57.7% on swe-bench-pro (complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning).

    Do you want to find a model for your constraints?

    Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.

    Open Model Finder