whichLlmmodel
Back to Dashboard

MetaLlama-3.1 70BVSMistral AIMistral Small 4

Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|Updated: June 2026

Our Take

We recommend Mistral Small 4 if you need peak intelligence and a much larger context window for full-repo analysis, or the free Llama-3.1 70B if you want zero API costs and total offline privacy. While Mistral Small 4 offers superior reasoning capability (hostable locally or via API), Llama-3.1 70B runs entirely on your own local hardware. Choose Mistral Small 4 for repository-scale analysis, or Llama-3.1 70B for zero-cost offline privacy and basic standalone code completion and simple functions.
WHY?
Benchmark Calculations & Evidence:
  • Reasoning Accuracy: Both models were evaluated on the GPQA Diamond benchmark. Mistral Small 4 scored 71.2%, while Llama-3.1 70B scored 46.7% (+24.5% gap).
  • Coding Performance: Evaluated on different benchmarks. Llama-3.1 70B scored 80.5% on HumanEval (basic standalone code completion and simple functions), while Mistral Small 4 scored 63.6% on LiveCodeBench (scripting single-file apps or clearly defined functions).
  • Context Window: Mistral Small 4 supports a 262k context window, while Llama-3.1 70B supports 131k.
  • Hosting Model: Llama-3.1 70B runs locally for $0 API costs, while Mistral Small 4 is a cloud API.
  • Was this recommendation helpful?
    Model Specs

    Llama-3.1 70B

    Open Source

    Benchmarks & Scores

    Coding (human-eval)
    80.5%

    basic standalone code completion and simple functions

    Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
    46.7%

    graduate-level science QA

    Cost & Context

    Cost (per 1M tokens)
    Self HostLocal execution (zero API fees)
    Context Window
    131.07k tokens
    Model Specs

    Mistral Small 4

    Open SourceAPI Available

    Benchmarks & Scores

    Coding (live-code-bench)
    63.6%

    scripting single-file apps or clearly defined functions

    Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+24.5%)
    71.2%

    graduate-level science QA

    Cost & Context

    Cost (per 1M tokens)
    $0.26Input: $0.15 | Output: $0.60
    Context WindowLarger
    262.14k tokens

    Frequently Asked Questions about Llama-3.1 70B vs Mistral Small 4

    For coding tasks, Llama-3.1 70B scores 80.5% on human-eval (basic standalone code completion and simple functions), while Mistral Small 4 scores 63.6% on live-code-bench (scripting single-file apps or clearly defined functions).

    Do you want to find a model for your constraints?

    Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.

    Open Model Finder