whichLlmmodel
Back to Dashboard

MetaLlama-3.1 405BVSxAIGrok 4.20

Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|Updated: June 2026

Our Take

We recommend Grok 4.20 if you need peak intelligence and a much larger context window for full-repo analysis, or the free Llama-3.1 405B if you want zero API costs and total offline privacy. While Grok 4.20 offers superior reasoning capability, Llama-3.1 405B runs entirely on your own local hardware. Choose Grok 4.20 for repository-scale analysis, or Llama-3.1 405B for zero-cost offline privacy and basic standalone code completion and simple functions.
WHY?
Benchmark Calculations & Evidence:
  • Reasoning Accuracy: Both models were evaluated on the GPQA Diamond benchmark. Grok 4.20 scored 90%, while Llama-3.1 405B scored 50.7% (+39.3% gap).
  • Coding Performance: Evaluated on different benchmarks. Llama-3.1 405B scored 89% on HumanEval (basic standalone code completion and simple functions), while Grok 4.20 scored 51.8% on SWE-bench Pro (complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning).
  • Context Window: Grok 4.20 supports a 1M context window, while Llama-3.1 405B supports 131k.
  • Hosting Model: Llama-3.1 405B runs locally for $0 API costs, while Grok 4.20 is a cloud API.
  • Was this recommendation helpful?
    Model Specs

    Llama-3.1 405B

    Open Source

    Benchmarks & Scores

    Coding (human-eval)
    89%

    basic standalone code completion and simple functions

    Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
    50.7%

    graduate-level science QA

    Cost & Context

    Cost (per 1M tokens)
    Self HostLocal execution (zero API fees)
    Context Window
    131.07k tokens
    Model Specs

    Grok 4.20

    Benchmarks & Scores

    Coding (swe-bench-pro)
    51.8%

    complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning

    Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+39.3%)
    90%

    graduate-level science QA

    Cost & Context

    Cost (per 1M tokens)
    $3.00Input: $2.00 | Output: $6.00
    Context WindowLarger
    1.05M tokens

    Frequently Asked Questions about Llama-3.1 405B vs Grok 4.20

    For coding tasks, Llama-3.1 405B scores 89% on human-eval (basic standalone code completion and simple functions), while Grok 4.20 scores 51.8% on swe-bench-pro (complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning).

    Do you want to find a model for your constraints?

    Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.

    Open Model Finder