Google Gemma 4 31B VS xAI Grok 4.5
⚖️Our Take
This matchup is a choice between local privacy and cloud scale. Gemma 4 31B runs entirely on your own hardware for zero API costs and absolute data privacy. However, Grok 4.5 is served via cloud API, offering superior reasoning accuracy (+8.7% on GPQA Diamond) and a significantly larger context window (500k vs 262k). We recommend Gemma 4 31B for private, offline workflows, or Grok 4.5 if you need to process large context sizes or require peak intelligence.
Was this recommendation helpful?
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (live-code-bench)
80%good at single-file apps, building games & UIs, and scripting new logic
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
84.3%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Performance
Cost (per 1M tokens)
Self HostLocal execution (zero API fees)Context Window
262.14k tokensBenchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
64.7%excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+8.7%)
93%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Performance
Cost (per 1M tokens)
$3.00Input: $2.00 | Output: $6.00Context WindowLarger
500k tokensFrequently Asked Questions about Gemma 4 31B vs Grok 4.5 comparison
For coding tasks, Gemma 4 31B scores 80% on live-code-bench (good at single-file apps, building games & UIs, and scripting new logic), while Grok 4.5 scores 64.7% on swe-bench-pro (excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases).
Related Matchups
Explore similar comparisons for Gemma 4 31B and Grok 4.5.