whichLlmmodel
Back to Dashboard

GoogleGemma 4 12BVSOpenAIGPT-5.4 nano

Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|Updated: June 2026

Our Take

We recommend GPT-5.4 nano if you need peak intelligence and a much larger context window for full-repo analysis, or the free Gemma 4 12B if you want zero API costs and total offline privacy. While GPT-5.4 nano offers superior reasoning capability, Gemma 4 12B runs entirely on your own local hardware. Choose GPT-5.4 nano for repository-scale analysis, or Gemma 4 12B for zero-cost offline privacy and scripting single-file apps or clearly defined functions.
WHY?
Benchmark Calculations & Evidence:
  • Reasoning Accuracy: Both models were evaluated on the GPQA Diamond benchmark. GPT-5.4 nano scored 82.8%, while Gemma 4 12B scored 78.8% (+4.0% gap).
  • Coding Performance: Evaluated on different benchmarks. Gemma 4 12B scored 72% on LiveCodeBench (scripting single-file apps or clearly defined functions), while GPT-5.4 nano scored 52.4% on SWE-bench Pro (complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning).
  • Context Window: GPT-5.4 nano supports a 400k context window, while Gemma 4 12B supports 262k.
  • Hosting Model: Gemma 4 12B runs locally for $0 API costs, while GPT-5.4 nano is a cloud API.
  • Was this recommendation helpful?
    Model Specs

    Gemma 4 12B

    Open Source

    Benchmarks & Scores

    Coding (live-code-bench)
    72%

    scripting single-file apps or clearly defined functions

    Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
    78.8%

    graduate-level science QA

    Cost & Context

    Cost (per 1M tokens)
    Self HostLocal execution (zero API fees)
    Context Window
    262.14k tokens
    Model Specs

    GPT-5.4 nano

    Benchmarks & Scores

    Coding (swe-bench-pro)
    52.4%

    complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning

    Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+4.0%)
    82.8%

    graduate-level science QA

    Cost & Context

    Cost (per 1M tokens)
    $0.46Input: $0.20 | Output: $1.25
    Context WindowLarger
    400k tokens

    Frequently Asked Questions about Gemma 4 12B vs GPT-5.4 nano

    For coding tasks, Gemma 4 12B scores 72% on live-code-bench (scripting single-file apps or clearly defined functions), while GPT-5.4 nano scores 52.4% on swe-bench-pro (complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning).

    Do you want to find a model for your constraints?

    Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.

    Open Model Finder