GoogleGemini 3.6 FlashVSxAIGrok 4.3
Our Take
Standardized reasoning and coding benchmarks are currently pending verification for one or both of these models. We recommend testing Gemini 3.6 Flash and Grok 4.3 directly in their respective provider playgrounds to see which fits your specific prompt styles best.
Was this recommendation helpful?
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
58.7%excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+2.9%)
93%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)
$3.00Input: $1.50 | Output: $7.50Context Window
1.05M tokensBenchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/Aexcellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
90.1%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)1.9x cheaper
$1.56Input: $1.25 | Output: $2.50Context Window
1.05M tokensFrequently Asked Questions about Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 is cheaper than Gemini 3.6 Flash. Grok 4.3 has a blended cost of $1.56/1M tokens, which is about 1.9x cheaper than Gemini 3.6 Flash at $3.00/1M tokens.
Related Matchups
Explore similar comparisons for Gemini 3.6 Flash and Grok 4.3.
Do you want to find a model for your constraints?
Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.