whichLlmmodel
Back to Dashboard

GoogleGemini 3.5 FlashVSZ.ai (Zhipu AI)GLM-4.7

Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|Updated: June 2026

Our Take

We recommend Gemini 3.5 Flash if you need peak intelligence for complex complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning, or the 3.4x cheaper GLM-4.7 if your workflow is limited to multi-file code and clearly defined tasks. While Gemini 3.5 Flash holds a major reasoning advantage, GLM-4.7 is optimized for high-volume budget pipelines. Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash for architectural codebase planning, or GLM-4.7 to maximize your budget for basic scripts.
WHY?
Benchmark Calculations & Evidence:
  • Coding Evaluation: Gemini 3.5 Flash was evaluated on SWE-bench Pro (scoring 55.1%), while GLM-4.7 was evaluated on SWE-bench Verified (scoring 73.8%).
  • Reasoning Accuracy: Both models were evaluated on the GPQA Diamond benchmark. Gemini 3.5 Flash scored 92.2%, while GLM-4.7 scored 85.7%.
  • Cost Efficiency: GLM-4.7 pricing ($0.6/M input, $2.2/M output) is 3.4x cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Flash ($1.5/M input, $9/M output).
  • Was this recommendation helpful?
    Model Specs

    Gemini 3.5 Flash

    Benchmarks & Scores

    Coding (swe-bench-pro)
    55.1%

    complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning

    Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+6.5%)
    92.2%

    graduate-level science QA

    Cost & Context

    Cost (per 1M tokens)
    $3.38Input: $1.50 | Output: $9.00
    Context WindowLarger
    1.05M tokens
    Model Specs

    GLM-4.7

    Open SourceAPI Available

    Benchmarks & Scores

    Coding (swe-bench-verified)
    73.8%

    multi-file code and clearly defined tasks

    Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
    85.7%

    graduate-level science QA

    Cost & Context

    Cost (per 1M tokens)3.4x cheaper
    $1.00Input: $0.60 | Output: $2.20
    Context Window
    202.75k tokens

    Frequently Asked Questions about Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GLM-4.7

    GLM-4.7 is cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Flash. GLM-4.7 has a blended cost of $1.00/1M tokens, which is about 3.4x cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Flash at $3.38/1M tokens.

    For coding tasks, Gemini 3.5 Flash scores 55.1% on swe-bench-pro (complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning), while GLM-4.7 scores 73.8% on swe-bench-verified (multi-file code and clearly defined tasks).

    Do you want to find a model for your constraints?

    Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.

    Open Model Finder