whichllmmodel
Back to Dashboard
Google

Gemini 3.5 Flash

VS
Google

Gemma 4 E4B

✍️ Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|📅 Updated: June 2026

Decision Recommendation

⚖️ Editorial Verdict: In our analysis, Gemini 3.5 Flash is the premium intelligence choice, scoring 55.1% higher on coding benchmarks. However, this accuracy premium comes with a cost overhead: Gemma 4 E4B is 1.0x cheaper to run. If you are building high-volume, simple chatbots or processing massive amounts of text where budget is critical, Gemma 4 E4B offers excellent cost savings. For agentic reasoning, code refactoring, or complex logical tasks, the accuracy premium of Gemini 3.5 Flash fully justifies the cost.

Model Specs

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)Winner (+)
55.1%
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+33.6%)
92.2%

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)
$3.38Input: $1.50 | Output: $9.00
Speed
280 tps
Context WindowLarger
1M tokens
Model Specs

Gemma 4 E4B

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/A
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
58.6%

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)
N/AInput: N/A | Output: N/A
Speed
N/A
Context Window
131.07k tokens
Read our data collection methodology

Frequently Asked Questions

Pricing data is currently unavailable for one or both of these models, so a direct cost comparison cannot be determined.

Speed data is not available for Gemma 4 E4B, while Gemini 3.5 Flash generates 280 tokens per second.

Gemini 3.5 Flash is better for coding tasks. It scores 55.1% on coding evaluations (swe-bench-pro) compared to Gemma 4 E4B which scores N/A.

Want to customize weights or add more models?

Open our interactive dashboard where you can adjust your priority levels for speed, budget, or accuracy slider-bars and watch model rankings calculate dynamically.

Customize in Interactive Dashboard