whichLlmmodel
Back to Dashboard

GoogleGemini 3.5 Flash LiteVSZ.ai (Zhipu AI)GLM-5.2

Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|Updated: June 2026

Our Take

This matchup represents a clear tradeoff between peak intelligence and budget efficiency. GLM-5.2 is noticeably superior (holding a 7.6% average lead in benchmarks), but it carries a significant 2.5x price premium. Choose GLM-5.2 if you need top-tier reasoning or code debugging, but for high-volume pipelines, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the smarter business decision.
Was this recommendation helpful?
Model Specs

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)
54.2%

excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases

Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
84%

graduate-level science QA

Cost & Context

Cost (per 1M tokens)2.5x cheaper
$0.85Input: $0.30 | Output: $2.50
Context Window
1.05M tokens
Model Specs

GLM-5.2

Open SourceAPI Available

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)Winner (+7.9%)
62.1%

excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases

Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+7.2%)
91.2%

graduate-level science QA

Cost & Context

Cost (per 1M tokens)
$2.15Input: $1.40 | Output: $4.40
Context Window
1.05M tokens

Frequently Asked Questions about Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs GLM-5.2

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is cheaper than GLM-5.2. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has a blended cost of $0.85/1M tokens, which is about 2.5x cheaper than GLM-5.2 at $2.15/1M tokens.

GLM-5.2 is better for coding tasks on this benchmark. It scores 62.1% on swe-bench-pro (excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases) compared to Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite which scores 54.2%.

Do you want to find a model for your constraints?

Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.

Open Model Finder