GoogleGemini 3.5 Flash LiteVSOpenAIGPT-5.5 Pro
Our Take
Standardized reasoning and coding benchmarks are currently pending verification for one or both of these models. We recommend testing Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GPT-5.5 Pro directly in their respective provider playgrounds to see which fits your specific prompt styles best.
Was this recommendation helpful?
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
54.2%excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
84%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)79.4x cheaper
$0.85Input: $0.30 | Output: $2.50Context Window
1.05M tokensBenchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/Aexcellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+12.2%)
96.2%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)
$67.50Input: $30.00 | Output: $180.00Context WindowLarger
1.05M tokensFrequently Asked Questions about Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs GPT-5.5 Pro
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is cheaper than GPT-5.5 Pro. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has a blended cost of $0.85/1M tokens, which is about 79.4x cheaper than GPT-5.5 Pro at $67.50/1M tokens.
Related Matchups
Explore similar comparisons for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GPT-5.5 Pro.
Do you want to find a model for your constraints?
Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.